![]() ![]() When I try to transfer my Mario(2.0)Levels from my calculator, TI connect(1.6) gives me the error, "The name for this variable is not valid." Is this a common problem, making it an error in the software? Anyone who knows anything about Harry Potter knows that much. :P Why not get it banned? It's the best way to advertise a product. Sure, your'e going to get sent to jail for playing Wolfstein. It's a Governmental conspiracy! They want everyone to forget about their mistakes! :O Although you fight _against_ the nazis in these games. ![]() We are even not allowed to play Wolfenstein 3d (or its successors) because of some symbols. It could fry your fragile innocent young minds! ) Oopsies! If anyone's from else is from Germany don't read the above Hitler post. Now I'm no longer allowed to to view this site. The important thing is that we're staying ON TOPIC. If you really want to nitpick I made Hitler's grease-spot of a mustashe to long too. You know if Eric were a Jew, he would be plotting YOUR downfall right about now. "What's this data flow from the processor to the RAM? Not an approved action.better stop it!" The link program might search the COM ports and find the modem which is protected by the firewall, or the firewall could be fascist and try to monitor every exchange of data in the computer. Some firewalls interfere with linking.ĭo you have an example? (Of your second statement that is. Even if it did, I would imagine that it could be set to be ignored by the firewall. ![]() How does a fire wall interfeer with linking? Their views are not necessarily those of, and takes no responsibility for their content. The comments below are written by visitors. Those of you with a 84+/84+ SE will also want to download the newly released v2.30 operating system. Some notable idiosyncrasies remain, such as the warning that firewalls may interfere with linking. Most of the changes appear to be nonvisible to the user. TI has finally released version 1.6 of their TI Connect linking software. Posted by Michael on 24 January 2005, 03:35 GMT ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |